Mammograms Ancient Radiation Machines
Posted by politicol in Business News, Health, Health Care Reform Bill, Politicol News, Technology, tags: breast cancer detection, cancer, cancer causing tests, mammograms ancient medicine, radiation from mammograms, the cancer industry, thermography effectivenessNov 19, 2009 10:10 a.m.
Radiation from mammograms are dangerous on the other hand thermograms are far safer with a 97 percent sensitivity to detect breast cancer. The CBS News reports in this video that thermography is also FDA approved.
Then why are all US hospitals using ancient radiation machines like Mammogram technology that do more harm to possible tumors? Why is thermography being ingnored as the cancer industry fumbles to spin the failures of mammogram machines.
Thermography Detects Cancer Before Tumors Grow
Thermography can detect tumors before they happen by documenting temperature changes and cold spots in the breast. Thermography is painless, does not give the patient radiation, is cost effective and totally harmless. You can have several thermograms every year without worry and pain.
The question remains: Why is the US government funding such ancient medical equipment that doesn’t even work and gives women cancer?
TAGS: the cancer industry, thermography effectiveness, mammograms ancient medicine, radiation from mammograms, breast cancer detection, cancer, cancer causing tests.
Women that want to continue to subject themselves to harmful radiation and tumor metastitis by damaging a possible tumor really need to explore the alternatives that are healthy, safe and 100 times more effective in breast cancer detection.
Women must learn not to accept the status quo and accept what the cancer industry calls the Gold Standard in breast cancer detection. Women must arm themselves with the best tools, the safest methods and not rely on old ancient and dangerous machines that are ineffective and promoted for profit.
Welcome back....good to see you again!Our Readers Also Read
November 19, 2009 -- Mammogram Debate and the Cancer Business
Again we have a record breaking failure of modern medicine to agree with itself and further live saving measures to actu...November 17, 2009 -- 2009 Breast Cancer Screening New Guidelines
November 17, 2009 10:16 a.m. When should women start screening for breast cancer? The more valid question is “when w...May 15, 2009 -- Farrah Fawcett’s Story Teaches Us
[caption id="attachment_1401" align="alignleft" width="231" caption="Farah Fawcett"][/caption] Dedicated to a Very Sp...
Entries (RSS)
Sounds good to me, but being that mammograms are more commonly used (I assume) this new recommendation for women to wait until age 50 to begin getting mammograms and to do so less frequently just seems ridiculous.
http://www.newsy.com/videos/new_study_on_mammograms_raises_skepticism
The ideal situation Lauren is to have Thermographic Imaging done first at any age- totally harmless and can detect cancer before it forms a tumor, now what is wrong with that picture? Women have been brainwashed into medical theories that are just not holding water under scrutiny – mammograms have a poor success rate in reducing deaths by breast cancer.
You would have to wait until your tumor grows under the present system to be able to detect it by a mammogram.
Do we really want to wait that long?
Thanks for your comment
P. Neisman
Editor
[...] Mammograms not as Effective as Thermograms | [...]